Showing 1 - 10 of 19
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012034190
Agency theory suggests that CEOs view dividends unfavorably because dividend payouts deprive them of the free cash flow they could otherwise exploit. Using Bebchuk, Cremers, and Peyer's (2011) CEO pay slice (CPS) to measure CEO power, we find that an increase in CEO power by one standard...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012926278
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012939829
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010482051
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010414798
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010441843
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010238921
We explore the role of powerful CEOs on the extent of risk-taking, using Bebchuk, Cremers, and Peyer's (2011) CEO pay slice (CPS). Based on more than 12,000 observations over 20 years (1992-2012), our results reveal a non-monotonic association. In particular, relatively less powerful CEOs...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013053761
Motivated by agency theory, we explore how powerful CEOs view leverage. Due to the agency conflict, CEOs may adopt sub-optimal leverage levels that promote their own private benefits at the expense of shareholders. Using Bebchuk, Cremers, and Peyer's (2011) CEO pay slice (CPS) to gauge CEO...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013061799
Motivated by agency theory, this study attempts to ascertain whether chief executive compensation is influenced by legal rules. In particular, we analyze whether Delaware law has an impact on CEO pay. Legal rules have been argued to impact agency conflicts. Agency costs, in turn, affect CEO...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013110444