Narrow search
Showing 1 - 10 of 19
Cover Image
Endogenous entry in markets with unobserved quality
Creane, Anthony; Jeitschko, Thomas D. - 2012
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009737011
Cover Image
Endogenous entry in markets with unobserved quality
Creane, Anthony; Jeitschko, Thomas D. - In: The journal of industrial economics 64 (2016) 3, pp. 494-519
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011574445
Cover Image
Adverse selection, moral hazard and entry
Creane, Anthony - 1995
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000923669
Cover Image
Note on uncertainty and socially excessive entry
Creane, Anthony - In: International journal of economic theory 3 (2007) 4, pp. 329-334
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003686619
Cover Image
The profitable supression of inventions: Technology choice and entry deterrence
Creane, Anthony; Miyagiwa, Kaz - 2007
AT&T was known for both funding a world-class research lab and delaying deployment of useful innovations from the lab. To explain this behavior we consider a model with an incumbent facing a potential entrant. The incumbent can choose from two technologies for production: old and new. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010332466
Cover Image
The unilateral incentives for technology transfers : predation (and deterrence) by proxy
Creane, Anthony; Konishi, Hideo - In: International journal of industrial organization 27 (2009) 3, pp. 379-389
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003854988
Cover Image
The unilateral incentives for technology transfers : predation (and deterrence) by proxy
Creane, Anthony; Konishi, Hideo - 2008
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003838350
Cover Image
Forgoing invention to deter entry
Creane, Anthony; Miyagiwa, Kazuyuki - In: International journal of industrial organization 27 (2009) 5, pp. 632-638
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003897370
Cover Image
The profitable supression of inventions : technology choice and entry deterrence
Creane, Anthony (contributor);  … - 2007
AT&T was known for both funding a world-class research lab and delaying deployment of useful innovations from the lab. To explain this behavior we consider a model with an incumbent facing a potential entrant. The incumbent can choose from two technologies for production: old and new. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003588141
Cover Image
The Profitable Suppression of Inventions : Technology Choice and Entry Deterrence
Miyagiwa, Kaz; Creane, Anthony - 2015
AT&T was known for both funding a world-class research lab and delaying deployment of useful innovations from the lab. To explain this behavior we consider a model with an incumbent facing a potential entrant. The incumbent can choose from two technologies for production: old and new. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014221709