Showing 1 - 10 of 18
This paper was presented to the May 2013 conference of the Postglobalization Initiative in Moscow, and deals with the function of economics in the modern world order. It seeks to explain why, as a profession (notwithstanding individual exceptions) economics failed to predict the crisis that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011260071
This is a prepublication version of ‘Money, Labor, and Logic: A critical comparison’, published in Critique of Political Economy. Please cite as Freeman, A. 2011. ‘Money, Labor, and Logic: A critical comparison’, Critique of Political Economy No. 1. 152-175. The article seeks to promote...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011260996
This paper was presented to the Brasilian Society for Political Economy at its 1998 conference. It presents the principal differences between the temporal and the simultaneist approach to the theory of value. It was the first paper to present a formal conceptual analogy between the temporal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005837170
This text comprises chapter 1 of Marx and non-equilibrium Economics[1]. It specifies a non-equilibrium (temporal) interpretation of Marx’s theory of value which demonstrates a fully consistent transformation of values into prices and reproduces Marx’s tendential law of the falling profit...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005620036
This article was published in Freeman, Alan (2006): Die Himmel über uns. Über die Bedeutung des Gleichgewichts für die Wirtschaftswissenschaft, EXIT! Krise und Kritik der Warengesellschaft 3, 212-241 It is the German translation of an chapter originally published in Mosini, V (ed) (2007)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005621679
This paper was originally presented at a conference on value organized by the Laboratory for Social Change in Rome, which staged a debate on value theory involving Andrew Kliman, Alan Freeman, Mino Carchedi, Gary Mongiovi, Fabio Petri, Duncan Foley, and Ernesto Screpanti. The paper was a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005621765
This is a prepublication version of ‘Replicating Marx: a reply to Mohun’, Capital and Class No. 88, Spring 2006, pp 117-123. ISSN 0309 8168 Kliman (2001) showed that “simultaneist” interpretations – those which hold that Marx valued inputs and outputs simultaneously – contradict his...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005621854
Prepublication version of ‘Simultaneous Valuation vs. the Exploitation Theory of Profit: A summing up’, forthcoming in Capital and Class #94, Spring 2008 This paper examines the claims made by Simon Mohun and Roberto Veneziani in their Capital and Class #92 article entitled ‘The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005621904
This unpublished paper was developed out of a numerical example posted on the PEN-L list in June 1995 and submitted to Review of Political Economy in September 1996. It demonstrates that, contrary to the ‘Fundamental Marxian Theorem’ (FMT) and the claims of the surplus (post-Sraffian)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005622060
El propósito de este artículo es presentar una caracterización teórica de una de las categorías propias del análisis económico de Marx, como es la composición del capital, la cual a su vez incorpora tres variantes, la dimensión técnica, en valor y orgánica. A partir de un análisis de...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008853927