Showing 1 - 10 of 344
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012172942
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011542733
Recent validation studies show that survey misreporting is pervasive and biases common analyses. Addressing this problem is further complicated, because validation data are usually convenience samples and access is restricted, making them more suitable to document than to solve the problem. I...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011543927
We propose a first order bias correction term for the Gini index to reduce the bias due to grouping. The first order correction term is obtained from studying the estimator of the Gini index within a measurement error framework. In addition, it reveals an intuitive formula for the remaining...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011377108
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011455266
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012137368
This paper provides a critical survey and synthesis of the recent economic literature on intergenerational mobility in developing countries, with a focus on data and methodological challenges. The attenuation due to measurement error is compounded by sample truncation resulting from co-residency...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012137964
This paper seeks to illuminate the uncertainty in official GDP per capita measures using auxiliary data. Using satellite-recorded nighttime lights as an additional measurement of true GDP per capita, we provide a statistical framework, in which the error in official GDP per capita may depend on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012019789
This study examines recall bias in farm labor by conducting a randomized survey experiment in Ghana. Hours of farm labor obtained from a recall survey conducted at the end of the season are compared with data collected weekly throughout the season. The study finds that the recall method...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012004782
This paper presents evidence that the quality of survey data on household incomes systematically improves across waves of a panel. Our estimates indicate that the effect of being interviewed for a second time is to increase the mean of reported monthly income by £142 (8 percent). Dependent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011569236