Similar Search Results

Cognitive tests used in selection can have content validity as well as criterion validity : a broader research review and implications for practice

Schmidt, Frank L. - In: International journal of selection and assessment 20 (2012) 1, pp. 1-13

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009518231

Content validity and cognitive tests : response to Kehoe (2012), Ployhart (2012), and Sackett (2012)

Schmidt, Frank L. - In: International journal of selection and assessment 20 (2012) 1, pp. 28-35

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009520204

Cognitive tests, constructs, and content validity : a commentary on Schmidt (2012)

Sackett, Paul R. - In: International journal of selection and assessment 20 (2012) 1, pp. 24-27

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009520215

The content validity of cognitively oriented tests : commentary on Schmidt (2012)

Ployhart, Robert E. - In: International journal of selection and assessment 20 (2012) 1, pp. 19-23

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009520221

What to make of content validity evidence for cognitive tests? : comments on Schmidt (2012)

Kehoe, Jerard F. - In: International journal of selection and assessment 20 (2012) 1, pp. 14-18

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009520225

Measurement Error Obfuscates Scientific Knowledge : Path to Cumulative Knowledge Requires Corrections for Unreliability and Psychometric Meta-Analyses

Viswesvaran, Chockalingam; Ones, Deniz S.; Schmidt, Frank L. - 2016

All measurements must contend with unreliability. No measure is free of measurement error. More attention must be paid to measurement error in all psychological research. The problem of reliability is more severe when rating scales are involved. Many of the constructs in...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014138980