Showing 1 - 10 of 13
Many texts which cover money creation regard the reserve requirement (RR) as being at the very centre of the process, and many still regard the process as starting with a bank receiving a new deposit (and placing the required reserves with the central bank, lending out the rest, which is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013110859
There is an immense body of literature on the relationship of money and output, with result-integrity depending on the aggregates used. This paper proposes an alternative two-step approach, based on the reality that: (1) money creation is just the outcome of new bank loans extended, and (2) the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013080929
Many scholars have fought valiantly to change perceptions on the process of money creation. However, misconceptions remain in place some quarters. In order to demonstrate empirically that a new bank loan creates a new bank deposit (without the bank having to recruit a new deposit), the author...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013082232
The state of bank liquidity, measured as the banks' net excess reserves (NER) with the central bank, is a critical element of the successful implementation of monetary policy. Central banks have absolute control over NER and manipulate it to bring about a positive NER (in QE periods) to drive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013082853
There is a profound misconception amongst certain commentators on money and banking: that quantitative easing creates new money. The misconception is either: (1) that new money is injected into the economy; (2) newly created excess reserves can be used by the banks to make new loans. Neither of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013083027
It is sometimes stated that government spending leads to money creation, at the same time providing the banks with excess reserves, leading to further money creation. This is so, but the statement ignores the fact that the money stock (and reserves) was depleted when revenue was raised in order...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013083185
After the discovery by the goldsmith-bankers that loans could be made by the issue of the newly accepted means of payments, receipts/bank notes, there was an inevitable next step: deposit money. Bank notes are deposits, but in a different form. Bank deposits are also accounting entries, but they...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013083838
It is a well-establish opinion that money creation has its genesis in the loan activities of the goldsmith-bankers in seventeenth-century London. This is accurate for bank note money, which had its origin in the receipts for precious metal deposits issued by the goldsmith-bankers. However, money...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013083847
Founded on the money multiplier, the imminent demise of which is not overstated, there exists a profound misconception: that money creation begins with a new deposit. In many cases the source of the new deposit is not specified, and somehow the recipient bank acquires reserves. In other cases...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013103442
The endogenous-exogenous money debate is a futile one. Exogenous money creation, based on the money multiplier, is not a money creation process. Rather, it is a monetary policy model, but in it money is still created endogenously: bank loans (and foreign asset accumulation by banks) concurrently...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013103829