Showing 1 - 10 of 14
We analyze the impact of product bundling in experimental markets. One firm has monopoly power in a first market but competes with another firm à la Cournot in a second market. We compare treatments where the multi-product firm (i) always bundles, (ii) never bundles, and (iii) chooses whether...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010204789
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011485490
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010421734
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002141225
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001657050
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001562065
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001562068
We report the results of experiments designed to test recent theories of vertical foreclosure. Consistent with the theory, the upstream firm has more difficulty commiting to supply the monopoly quantity in treatments with non-integration and secret contracts than in either treatments with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014146973
We report the results of experiments designed to test recent theories of vertical foreclosure. Consistent with the theory, vertical integration improves the upstream firm's ability to commit to restricting output to the monopoly level, as does the use of public contracts. Public contracts are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014126754
In a framework with an upstream monopoly and a downstream duopoly, we analyze the impact of convex costs on the downstream level. In contrast to the case of constant marginal costs, vertical integration does not imply complete market foreclosure. While the non-integrated downstream firm receives...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014113777