Showing 1 - 5 of 5
Prior to the Great Depression, regulators imposed double liability on bank shareholders to ensure financial stability and protect depositors. Under double liability, shareholders of failing banks lost their initial investment and had to pay up to the par value of the stock in order to compensate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011926198
Prior to the Great Depression, regulators imposed double liability on bank shareholders to ensure financial stability and protect depositors. Under double liability, shareholders of failing banks lost their initial investment and had to pay up to the par value of the stock in order to compensate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012909243
Prior to the Great Depression, regulators imposed double liability on bank shareholders to ensure financial stability and protect depositors. Under double liability, shareholders of failing banks lost their initial investment and had to pay up to the par value of the stock in order to compensate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012909468
Prior to the Great Depression, regulators imposed double liability on bank shareholders to ensure financial stability and protect depositors. Under double liability, shareholders of failing banks lost their initial investment and had to pay up to the par value of the stock in order to compensate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012909608
Scholars and regulators often maintain that extended shareholder liability reduces bank risk-taking. Prior to the Great Depression, double liability on bank shareholders was the predominant institutional framework aimed to constrain moral hazard. We examine whether increased shareholder...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012853220