Showing 1 - 10 of 2,092
We re-examine tacit collusion under a simple punishment rule in which firms match any lower price by their rivals, but otherwise leave their prices unchanged. We provide conditions under which this simple rule sustains collusion and is credible. Provided competition is imperfect, collusion can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014061873
cartel. I find that after this date, the two suspected firms i) were more likely to bid in the same auction and ii) submitted …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012129347
This paper explores the impact of debarment as a deterrent of collusion in first-price procurement auctions. We develop a procurement auction model where bidders can form bidding rings, and derive the bidding and collusive behavior under no sanction, debarment and fines. The model's predictions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011822812
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010241326
This study explores stability in efficient collusion in government procurement auctions. In first- and second-price auctions with independent private values, we look at the possibility of vetoing collusion mechanisms and the learning of the other bidders after vetoing. The collusions in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014211854
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012819866
This article presents the first experiment exploring the impact of debarments - the exclusion of colluding bidders - on collusion in procurement auctions. We find that debarments and their most common alternative, fines, reduce collusion and bids relative to a market with no sanction. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012852366
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014278116
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014384296
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002489759