Showing 1 - 5 of 5
Most studies of the predictability of returns are based on time series data, and whenever panel data are used, the testing is almost always conducted in an unrestricted unit by unit fashion, which makes for a very heavy parametrization of the model. On the other hand, the few panel tests that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010836347
The few panel data tests for predictability of returns that exist are based on the prerequisite that both the number of time series observations, T, and the number of crosssection units, N, are large. As a result, these tests are impossible for stock markets where lengthy time series data are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010836351
This paper proposes new unit root tests for panels where the errors may be not only serial and/or cross- orrelated, but also unconditionally heteroskedastic. Despite their generality, the test statistics are shown to be very simple to implement, requiring only minimal corrections and still the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010741276
Pesaran and Yamagata (Testing slope homogeneity in large panels, Journal of Econometrics 142, 50–93, 2008) propose a test for slope homogeneity in large panels, which has become very popular in the literature. However, the test cannot deal with the practically relevant case of heteroskedastic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010741278
As is well known, when using an information criterion to select the number of common factors in factor models the appropriate penalty is generally indetermine in the sense that it can be scaled by an arbitrary constant, c say, without affecting consistency. In an influential paper, Hallin and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011039081