Showing 1 - 10 of 29
This paper contrasts the performance of heterogeneous and shrinkage estimators versus the more traditional homogeneous panel data estimators. The analysis utilizes a panel data set from 21 French regions over the period 1973–1998 and a dynamic demand specification to study the gasoline demand...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005382203
This paper contrasts the performance of heterogeneous and shrinkage estimators versus the more traditional homogeneous panel data estimators. The analysis utilizes a panel data set from 21 French regions over the period 1973-1998 and a dynamic demand specification to study the gasoline demand in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005086457
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009396976
Chamberlain (1982) showed that the fixed effects (FE) specification imposes testable restrictions on the coefficients from regressions of all leads and lags of dependent variableson all leads and lags of independent variables. Angrist and Newey (1991) suggested computing this test statistic as...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005808255
Various forecasts using panel data with spatial error correlation are compared using Monte Carlo experiments. The true data generating process is assumed to be a simple error component regression model with spatial remainder disturbances of the autoregressive or moving average type. The best...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010617666
This paper reconsiders the Tobin q investment model studied by Hsiao et al. (1999) using a panel of 337 U.S. firms over the period 1982–1998. It contrasts the out-of-sample forecasts performance of hierarchical Bayes, shrinkage, as well as heterogeneous and homogeneous panel data estimators....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005758271
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009546961
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010378815
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012267289
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010439610