Showing 1 - 10 of 423
Post-grant validity challenges at patent offices rely on the private initiative of third parties to correct mistakes made by patent offices. We hypothesize that incentives to bring post-grant validity challenges are reduced when many firms benefit from revocation of a patent and when firms are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010352087
The contributory infringement rule assesses liability to a third party that contributes tothe infringement of a patent. Not only are firms that directly infringe liable, those whoindirectly contribute are also liable. We investigate how this rule affects the creation of anetwork of members...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009360891
This paper assesses the impact of adopting a post-grant review institution in the US patent system by comparing the 'opposition careers' of European Patent Office (EPO) equivalents of litigated US patents to those of a control group of EPO patents. We demonstrate several novel methods of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010366523
We compare patent litigation cases across four European jurisdictions – Germany, France, the Netherlands, and the UK – covering cases filed during the period 2000-2008. For our analysis, we assemble a new dataset that contains detailed information at the case, litigant, and patent level for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013075267
As an economist, I find the current state of the law regarding damages for patent infringement – most particularly that relating to apportionment – frustrating at best and woefully incomplete at worst. Namely, damages case law for utility patent infringement provides two very different, but...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012963876
Congress “repeatedly stated [that] its paramount goal” in having inter partes review (IPR) before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or the Board) was to “serve as a cheaper, faster alternative to be used instead of – rather than in addition to – litigation in district court.”...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012953200
The patent system is commonly justified as a way to promote social welfare and, more specifically, technological progress. For years, however, there has been concern that patent litigation is undermining, rather than furthering, these goals. Particularly in the United States, the time, cost, and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012943659
This study examines whether companies' patents obtained had less impact on future operating cash flows during the period of most patent troll litigation, 2010 to 2014. We conduct analyses using cash flow predictive models and observations from companies that had consistently obtained patents...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012868775
An informed (prospective) plaintiff can send a take-it-or-leave-it demand to an uninformed (prospective) defendant with the threat of a lawsuit that may not be credible. In this context, the well-known perfect sepa- rating equilibrium in litigation bargaining game (Reinganum and Wilde, 1986) no...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012853017
Corporate officer liability doctrines under both the Patent Act and the Copyright Act diverge markedly from traditional corporate, agency, and tort law doctrines. This manuscript explores why the case law in federal patent and copyright cases differs so markedly not only from traditional legal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013052722