Showing 1 - 9 of 9
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010532465
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010238501
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001306776
This paper analyzes the optimal protection strategy for an innovator of a complex innovation who faces the risk of imitation by a competitor. We suppose that the innovation can be continuously fragmented into sub-innovations. We characterize the optimal mix of patent and trade secrets when the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013040387
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012888282
This paper analyzes the optimal protection strategy for an innovator of a complex innovation who faces the risk of imitation by a competitor. We suppose that the innovation can be continuously fragmented into sub-innovations. We characterize the optimal mix of patent and trade secrets when the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010211454
This paper analyzes the optimal protection strategy for an innovator of a complex innovation who faces the risk of imitation by a competitor. We suppose that the innovation can be continuously fragmented into sub-innovations. We characterize the optimal mix of patent and trade secrets when the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013315682
This note seeks to understand the tension between trade secrecy law and patent law pointed out by Judge Hand. Further, this Note argues that the recently enacted America Invents Act (“AIA”) overrules the holding from Metallizing Engineering that secret prior commercial use by an inventor...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014163449
Patents and trade secrecy have long been considered substitute incentives for innovation. When inventors create a new invention, they traditionally must choose between the two. And if inventors choose to patent their invention, society provides strong legal protection in exchange for disclosure,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014123702