Showing 1 - 10 of 36
Workfare schemes impose work requirements on beneficiaries. This has seemed an attractive idea for self-targeting transfers to poor people. This incentive argument does not imply, however, that workfare is more cost-effective against poverty than even poorly-targeted options, given hidden costs...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011395949
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003794667
This paper assembles data at the all-India level and for the village of Palanpur, Uttar Pradesh, to document the growing importance, and influence, of the non-farm sector in the rural economy between the early 1980s and late 2000s. The suggestion from the combined National Sample Survey and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011395735
Public knowledge about India's ambitious Employment Guarantee Scheme is low in one of India's poorest states, Bihar, where participation is also unusually low. Is the solution simply to tell people their rights? Or does their lack of knowledge reflect deeper problems of poor people's agency and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011395875
"Minimum wages are generally thought to be unenforceable in developing rural economies. But there is one solution - a workfare scheme in which the government acts as the employer of last resort. Is this a cost-effective policy against poverty? Using a microeconometric model of the casual labor...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010522560
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011431577
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009759882
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010195514
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011445135
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011454048