Showing 1 - 10 of 4,962
We provide evidence that institutions place lower trading priority and delay their trading in small, illiquid stocks. The slow trading of small stocks in turn delays the adjustment of small stock prices. In contrast, for large, liquid stocks, institutions demand immediacy, which generates some...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012936857
The paper re-examines whether investors can predict oil and gas stock prices for abnormal returns using autocorrelation-based trading and filter rules and moving average based strategies. Short and long lengths moving averages were employed and their performances measured against the returns...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012914208
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003707351
We find that financial analysts provide more thorough forecasts when firms’ institutional investors are distracted (i.e., when firms are neglected). We establish the causality of the effect by identifying exogenous shocks leading to institutional investor distraction following Kempf, Manconi,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013404199
We observe that daily highs and lows of stock prices do not diverge over time and, hence, adopt the cointegration concept and the related vector error correction model (VECM) to model the daily high, the daily low, and the associated daily range data. The in-sample results attest the importance...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012707381
In a true out of sample test we find no evidence that several well-known technical trading strategies predict stock markets over the period of 1987 to 2011. Our test is free of the sample selection bias, data mining, hindsight bias, or any of the other usual biases that may affect results in our...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013106092
We show that a new measure of buy-side competition explains momentum profits. The momentum quintile spread is 1.11% when competition is low and negligible when competition is high. Better alphas are attained with superior Sharpe and Sortino ratios, no negative skewness and in more investible...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014349126
In this paper, we provide new empirical evidence on order submission activity and price impacts of limit orders at NASDAQ. Employing NASDAQ TotalView-ITCH data, we find that market participants dominantly submit limit orders with sizes equal to a round lot. Most limit orders are canceled almost...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013121274
In this paper, we provide new empirical evidence on order submission activity and price impacts of limit orders at NASDAQ. Employing NASDAQ TotalView-ITCH data, we find that market participants dominantly submit limit orders with sizes equal to a round lot. Most limit orders are canceled almost...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009266828
We revisit the apparent historical success of technical trading rules on daily prices of the DJIA index from 1897 to 2011, and use the False Discovery Rate as a new approach to data snooping. The advantage of the FDR over existing methods is that it selects more outperforming rules which allows...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003961414