Showing 1 - 10 of 3,669
This paper investigates whether risk preferences inform the decision of how much to put into the public account in the public goods game under the three different frames (the two house money effect frames: the standard and covered-loss frames, as well as the real-loss frame). The main...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010678798
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011879028
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011404033
With a series of public goods games in a 2x2-design, we analyze two channels that might moderate social dilemmas and increase cooperation without using pecuniary incentives: moral framing and shaming. Cooperation increases when non-contributing to a public good is framed as morally debatable and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011879913
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012391250
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011704189
Psychological game theory can provide rational-choice-based framing effects; frames influence beliefs, beliefs influence motivations. We explain this theoretically and explore empirical relevance experimentally. In a 2×2 design of one-shot public good games we show that frames affect subject's...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008699706
Psychological game theory can provide rational-choice-based framing effects; frames influence beliefs, beliefs influence motivations. We explain this theoretically and explore empirical relevance experimentally. In a 2x2 design of one-shot public good games we show that frames affect subject’s...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008986776
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009298314
In this paper, we report an experimental investigation of the effect of framing on social preferences, as revealed in a one-shot linear public goods game. We use two indicators to measure social preferences: self-reported emotional responses; and, as a behavioural indicator of disapproval,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003675323