Similar Search Results

Can a "veil of ignorance" reduce the impact of distortionary taxation on public good valuations?

Beeson, Morgan; Chilton, Susan M.; Jones-Lee, Michael W.; … - In: Journal of risk and uncertainty : JRU 58 (2019) 2/3, pp. 245-262

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012372766

Contingent valuation and social choices concerning public goods : an overview of theory, methods and issus

Chilton, Susan M. - In: Revue d'économie politique 117 (2007) 5, pp. 655-674

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003607862

Why do people non-demand reveal in hypothetical double referenda for public goods?

Burton, Anthony C.; Carson, Katherine Silz; Chilton, … - In: Applied economics 41 (2009) 25/27, pp. 3561-3569

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003921583

Exploring divergence between respondent and researcher definitions of the good in contingent valuation studies

Chilton, Susan M.; Hutchinson, W. G. - In: Journal of agricultural economics 50 (1999) 1, pp. 1-16

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001381043

Public resource allocation, strategic behavior, and status quo bias in choice experiments

Carson, Katherine Silz; Chilton, Susan M.; Hutchinson, W. G. - In: Public choice 185 (2020) 1/2, pp. 1-19

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012302707

Why Do People Non-Demand Reveal in Hypothetical Double Referenda for Public Goods?

Burton, Anthony - 2013

Hypothetical contingent valuation surveys used to elicit values for environmental and other public goods often employ variants of the referendum mechanism due to the cognitive simplicity and familiarity of respondents with this voting format. One variant, the double referendum mechanism,...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013076300