Showing 1 - 10 of 1,015
Offenders are more likely than non-offenders to be victims, and victims are more likely than non-victims to be offenders. The overlap between offenders and victims is not well understood in criminology, and in the economics of crime the stylized empirical fact is even widely ignored. The paper...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010201262
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003331218
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003470255
Physicians' treatment decisions determine the level of health care spending to a large extent. The analysis of physician agency describes how doctors trade off their own and their patients' benefits, with a third party (such as the collective of insured individuals or the taxpayers) bearing the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010341918
We study information acquisition in a coordination game with incomplete information. To capture the idea that players can flexibly decide what information to acquire, we do not impose any physical restriction on feasible information structure. Facing an informational cost measured by reduction...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013114641
This paper discusses the importance of paradoxes of irrationality for managers by elaborating upon the rational basis for the adoption of non-equilibrium strategies in game theory. It does so by revisiting the one-shot Traveler's Dilemma game, proposing a solution which reconciles the anomaly...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012719536
The main insight of this paper is that moral behavior does not necessarily alleviate coordination problems or may even worsen them, if individuals possess different degrees of morality. We characterize heterogenous Alger-Weibull morality preferences in a canonical model of voluntary...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014632345
The three-door problem is an astounding example of a systematic violation of a key rationality postulate. In this seemingly simple individual decision task, most people initially fail to correctly apply Bayes' Law, and to make the payoff-maximizing choice. Previous experimental studies have...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014104041
The three-door problem is an example of a systematic violation of a key rationality postulate that has attracted much attention. In this seemingly simple individual decision task, most people initially fail to apply correctly Bayes' Law, and to make the payoff-maximizing choice. Previous...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014065818
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011786670