Showing 1 - 9 of 9
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002940274
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011554718
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009738346
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009160968
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012239280
There are four types of dominance depending on whether domination is strict or weak and whether the dominating strategy is pure or mixed. Letting d vary over these four types of dominance, we say that a player is d-dominance rational when she does not play a strategy that is d-dominated relative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013299096
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013411523
The literary source of the main ideas in Aumann's article "Backward Induction and Common Knowledge of Rationality" is exposed and analyzed. The primordial archetypal images that underlie both this literary source and Aumann's work are delineated and are used to explain the great emotive impact...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014088854
Aumann (1995) showed that for games with perfect information common knowledge of substantive rationality implies backward induction. Substantive rationality is defined in epistemic terms, that is, in terms of knowledge. We show that when substantive rationality is defined in doxastic terms, that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010662459