Showing 1 - 10 of 608
market, monopoly pricing is well defined - as well as tests for predatory behavior; not so with multisided markets. Since the … markets for their potential for determining consumers' harm and welfare effects, as well as defining monopoly and predatory …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012151937
This paper analyses whether scale economies exists in the UK telecommunications industry. The approach employed differs from other UK studies in that panel data for a range of companies is used. This increases the number of observations and thus allows potentially for more robust tests for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005101769
This paper studies the pricing incentives of a monopolist constrained by a revenue cap endogenously determined by her costs in a so-called base year. Such regulation is employed, among others, to govern electricity distribution operators in Germany. We show that the revenue cap may incentivize...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014470709
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003809912
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010247755
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003733600
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003530237
Expected consumer's surplus rarely represents preferences over price lotteries. Still, I give sufficient conditions for policies which maximize aggregate expected surplus to be interim Pareto Optimal. Besides two standard partial equilibrium conditions, I assume that feasible prices satisfy a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013064210
We study how political factors can shape competition in the mobile telecommunication sector. We show that the way a government designs the rules of the game has an impact on concentration, competition, and prices. Pro-competition rules reduce prices, but do not hurt the quality of services or...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012934967
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000920486