Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003829810
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001593353
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001056405
Manufacturer competition for retail distribution is shown to often include partially exclusive contracts when competitive retailers have the ability to shift sales by loyal customers to a chosen manufacturer. Since each manufacturer knows its sales will increase substantially at the expense of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013133130
Standard monopolized the petroleum industry during the 1870s by cartelizing the stage of production where entry was difficult – petroleum transportation. Standard enforced the transportation cartel by shifting its refinery shipments among railroads to stabilize individual railroad market...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013067802
Kodak and Xerox are two recent, celebrated, and conflicting antitrust decisions. Both cases involve defendant firms that owned intellectual property and that refused to deal with independent service organizations. The most likely explanation for these refusals to deal was that both defendants...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012750736
The court in United States v. Microsoft Corporation paints a vivid picture of Microsoft as a monopolist taking aggressive competitive actions to protect its dominant Windows operating system against a challenge by Netscape. Even if one accepts the court’s factual description of Microsoft’s...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014192513
This paper clarifies the relation between per se hub-and-spoke and vertical rule of reason antitrust analysis, the tension between which is illustrated with a detailed examination of the Apple e-books case
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014123098