Showing 1 - 10 of 13
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009757113
In the spatial model of voting, voters choose the candidate closest to them in the ideological space. Recent work by (Degan and Merlo 2009) shows that it is falsifiable on the basis of individual voting data in multiple elections. We show how to tackle the fact that the model only partially...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013121005
In the spatial model of voting, voters choose the candidate closest to them in the ideological space. Recent work by Degan and Merlo (2009) shows that it is falsifiable on the basis of individual voting data in multiple elections. We show how to tackle the fact that the model only partially...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014189256
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003994187
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009748968
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010221912
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010221913
We investigate in this paper the theory and econometrics of optimal matchings with competing criteria. The surplus from a marriage match, for instance, may depend both on the incomes and on the educations of the partners, as well as on characteristics that the analyst does not observe.The social...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013150626
This paper exhibits a duality between the theory of revealed preference of Afriat and the housing allocation problem of Shapley and Scarf. In particular, it is shown that Afriat’s theorem can be interpreted as a second welfare theorem in the housing problem. Using this duality, the revealed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010812567
This paper exhibits a duality between the theory of revealed preference of Afriat and the housing allocation problem of Shapley and Scarf. In particular, it is shown that Afriat’s theorem can be interpreted as a second welfare theorem in the housing problem. Using this duality, the revealed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010728082