Showing 1 - 10 of 19
This paper investigates whether investors are compensated for taking on commonality risk in equity portfolios. A large literature documents the existence and the causes of commonality in illiquidity, but the implications for investors are less well understood. In a more than fifty year long...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012010445
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011911907
This study models the velocity (V2) of broad money (M2) since 1929, covering swings in money [liquidity] demand from changes in uncertainty and risk premia spanning the two major financial crises of the last century: the Great Depression and Great Recession. V2 is notably affected by risk...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011406249
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009768051
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011457164
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010399098
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014328240
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009790487
This paper investigates whether investors are compensated for taking on commonality risk in equity portfolios. A large literature documents the existence and the causes of commonality in illiquidity, but the implications for investors are less understood. In a more than fifty year long sample of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012974245
This study offers a single, consistent model that tracks the velocity of broad money (M2) since 1929, including the Great Depression, the global financial crisis, and the Great Recession. The model emphasizes the roles of changes in uncertainty and risk premia, financial innovation, and major...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012996466