Showing 1 - 10 of 12
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012504735
We test the pricing of the conditional systematic risk (β) of IML, a traded liquidity factor of the return premium on illiquid-minus-liquid stocks, with its risk premium varying over time. We find a positive and significant risk premium on conditional IML β, which rises in times of financial...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012855170
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001830309
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003392283
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010208670
Examining the illiquidity premium in stock markets across 45 countries, we find the following. First, the average illiquidity return premium across countries is positive and significant, after controlling for other pricing factors. The premium is measured by monthly return series on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013007710
This paper presents a liquidity factor IML, the return on illiquid-minus-liquid stock portfolios. The IML, adjusted for the common risk factors, measures the illiquidity premium whose annual alpha is about 4% over the period 1950-2012. I then test whether the systematic risk (β) of IML is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013033947
This paper reviews research on the effects of different measures of liquidity on asset prices. The foundation is the pricing of liquidity as an asset characteristic that began with the theoretical model and empirical evidence of Amihud and Mendelson (1986). The positive relation between expected...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013012481
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013282487
Lou and Shu decompose Amihud's illiquidity measure (ILLIQ) proposing that its component, the average of inverse dollar trading volume (IDVOL), is sufficient to explain the pricing of illiquidity. Their decomposition misses a component of ILLIQ that is related to illiquidity. We find that this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012852703