Showing 1 - 10 of 19
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005078258
A fixed-rate deposit insurance system provides a moral hazard for excessive risk taking and is not viable absent regulation. Although the deposit insurance system appears to have worked remarkably well over most of its 50-year history, major problems began to appear in the early 1980s. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005078269
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005078292
There are two seemingly inconsistent strands of the finance literature regarding the effects of bank capital regulation. On the one hand, the value maximization literature implies that more stringent capital regulation will reduce the probability of bank failure and the risk exposure of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005078306
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005078332
We use share price data to calculate bank asset volatilities, market capital-asset ratios, and the public-sector depositor protection liability for Australia. The results show that the average capital ratio for the Australian banking sector has risen over the past decade, while the riskiness of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005078344
This paper uses household consumption data to investigate whether uninsurable idiosyncratic risk accounts for the equity premium. The analysis complements and extends prior empirical work by relaxing maintained assumptions about idiosyncratic income shocks. Following Mankiw (1986), the paper...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010702306
One plausible mechanism through which financial market shocks may propagate across countries is through the effect of past gains and losses on investors’ risk aversion. The paper first presents a simple model examining how heterogeneous changes in investors’ risk aversion affects portfolio...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011026921
Under the strong-form of market discipline, publicly traded banks that have constantly available public market signals from their stock (and bond) prices would take less risk than non-publicly traded banks because counterparties, borrowers, and regulators could react to adverse public market...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005401566
This paper examines the properties of X-inefficiencies in U.S. banking firms. We find that, after controlling for scale differences, the average small size banking firm is less efficient than the aerate large firm. Smaller firms also exhibit higher variation in X-inefficiencies than their larger...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005401567