Showing 1 - 10 of 48
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003424959
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003934148
In the context of eliciting preferences for decision making under risk, we ask the question: which might be the 'best' method for eliciting such preferences?ʺ. It is well known that different methods differ in terms of the bias in the elicitation; it is rather less well-known that different...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003574363
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002474220
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011942342
In this paper, we first replicated Harrison et al. (2012). Then, we studied if the group’s size has an impact on group’s risk aversion. In line with Harrison et al. (2012), our results confirm that no significant differences occur between individuals and groups risk aversion in three-person...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011556337
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003789595
Previous research indicates that risky and uncertain marginal returns from the public good significantly lower contributions. This paper presents experimental results illustrating that the effects of risk and uncertainty depend on the employed parameterization. Specifically, if the value of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003887174
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003392299
In this paper, we first replicated Harrison et al. (2012). Then, we studied if the group's size has an impact on group's risk aversion. In line with Harrison et al. (2012), our results confirm that no significant differences occur between individuals and groups risk aversion in three-person...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011556606