Showing 1 - 10 of 12
We develop a dynamic model of strategic investment in a transnational pipeline system. In the absence of international contract enforcement, countries may distort investment in order to increase their bargaining power, resulting in overinvestment in expensive and underinvestment in cheap...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003793068
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003803377
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003513704
This paper provides a quantitative analysis of power relations and strategic investment in the transport system for Russian gas. First, we analyse how the architecture of the transport system determines Russia’s bargaining power vis-à-vis (potential) transit countries. By applying the Shapley...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011497648
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002096982
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003803378
We use cooperative game theory to analyze the strategic impact of three controversial pipeline projects. Two of them, Nord Stream and South Stream, allow Russian gas to bypass transit countries, Ukraine and Belarus. Nord Stream's strategic value turns out to be huge, justifying the high...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011374346
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011309249
We use cooperative game theory to analyze the impact of three controversial pipeline projects on the power structure in the Eurasian trade of natural gas. Two of them, Nord Stream and South Stream, allow Russian gas to bypass transit countries, Ukraine and Belarus. Nord Stream's strategic value...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009612359
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009125547