Showing 1 - 10 of 43
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003787630
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003338299
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003825416
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003947631
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009008157
Given the growing dissatisfaction with exclusion and long-run restrictions in structural vector autoregressive analysis, sign restrictions are becoming increasingly popular. So far there are no techniques for validating the shocks identified via such restrictions. Although in an ideal setting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009579219
Economic agents using information that is not incorporated in the econometric model is seen as a possible reason for why nonfundamental shocks are important in econometric models. Allowing for nonfundamental shocks in structural vector autoregressive (SVAR) analysis by considering moving average...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009579361
It is emphasized that the shocks in structural vector autoregressions are only identified up to sign and it is pointed out that this feature can result in very misleading confidence intervals for impulse responses if simulation methods such as Bayesian or bootstrap methods are used. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009579404
In structural vector autoregressive analysis identifying the shocks of interest via heteroskedasticity has become a standard tool. Unfortunately, the approaches currently used for modelling heteroskedasticity all have drawbacks. For instance, assuming known dates for variance changes is often...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010361372
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010385854