Showing 1 - 10 of 14
We discuss the impact of different formulations of asset pricing models on the outcome of specification tests that are performed using excess returns. It is generally believed that when only excess returns are used for testing asset pricing models, the mean of the stochastic discount factor...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003730472
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003730887
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003776354
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003885706
We show that in misspecified models with useless factors (for example, factors that are independent of the returns on the test assets), the standard inference procedures tend to erroneously conclude, with high probability, that these irrelevant factors are priced and the restrictions of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010195037
This paper studies some seemingly anomalous results that arise in possibly misspecified and unidentified linear asset-pricing models estimated by maximum likelihood and one-step generalized method of moments (GMM). Strikingly, when useless factors (that is, factors that are independent of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010395978
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010443073
Although it is of interest to test whether or not a particular asset pricing model is literally true, a more useful task for empirical researchers is to determine how wrong a model is and to compare the performance of competing asset pricing models. In this paper, we propose a new methodology to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013151012
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013188701
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012244829