Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011429476
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011773330
Conventional wisdom holds that joint audits would improve audit quality by enhancing audit evidence precision, because “Two heads are better than one,” and by enhancing auditor independence, because it is more expensive for a company to “bribe” two audit firms than one. Our paper...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012975120
The extant auditing literature documents an inconsistent relationship between audit fees and market concentration. In this paper, we argue that the impact of market concentration on audit fees is auditor and auditee specific. Based on the fact that the audit services to an auditee are generally...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013216299
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014380495
This paper presents a model of auditor-client relationship-building. Existing literature suggests that quasi-rents rising from long auditor tenure have a negative effect on auditor independence. In contrast to this conventional wisdom, our paper shows a positive effect of quasi-rents resulting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012901232
We revisit the notion of audit quality and investigate how audit quality is related to auditor size and the structure of the auditing industry. We discuss a model of audit firm competition where both audit quality and audit firm size are endogenous. Based on this model, we predict how certain...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012857516
Building on an auction model, we examine the economic consequences of audit retendering, under which the incumbent auditor in auction possesses both an information advantage and knowledge advantage over outside auditors. Audit retendering allows the firm to retain the incumbent auditor with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012863943