Showing 1 - 10 of 50
Economists have traditionally treated preferences as exogenously given. Preferences are assumed to be influenced by neither beliefs nor the constraints people face. As a consequence, changes in behaviour are explained exclusively in terms of changes in the set of feasible alternatives. Here the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011395049
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003319275
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009577661
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009706791
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009581188
According to economists, severe legal sanctions deter violations of the law. According to legal scholars, people may obey law backed by mild sanctions because of norm-activation. We experimentally investigate the effects of mild and severe legal sanctions in the provision of public goods. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011408944
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001636637
According to economists, severe legal sanctions deter violations of the law. According to legal scholars, people may obey law backed by mild sancions because of norm-activation. We experimentally investigate the effects of mild and severe legal sanctions in the provision of public goods. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001649176
It has been shown that participants in the dictator game are less willing to give money to the other participant when their choice set also includes the option to take money. We examine whether this effect is due to the choice set providing a signal about entitlements in a setting where...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013101543
According to economists, severe legal sanctions deter violations of the law. According to legal scholars, people may obey law backed by mild sanctions because of norm-activation. We experimentally investigate the effects of mild and severe legal sanctions in the provision of public goods. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013320735