Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001543678
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000918941
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001603707
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002567709
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001363991
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001248133
This paper derives sufficient conditions under which the Law of Comparative Advantage and the General Law of Comparative Advantage are true when the preferences of the trading countries may not be represented by "well-behaved" social utility functions. It shows that in the neoclassical framework...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014074402
Harsanyi (1997) argues that, for normative issues, informed preferences should be used, instead of actual preferences or happiness (or welfare). Following his argument allowing him to move from actual to informed preferences to its logical conclusion forces us to use happiness instead. Where...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014215102
Harsanyi (1997) argues that, for normative issues, informed preferences should be used, instead of actual preferences or happiness (or welfare). Following his argument allowing him to move from actual to informed preferences to its logical conclusion forces us to use happiness instead. Where...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014215331
Welfare economics is incomplete as it analyzes preferences without going on to analyze welfare (or happiness) which is the ultimate objective. Preference and welfare may differ due to imperfect knowledge, imperfect rationality, and/or a concern for the welfare of others (non-affective altruism)....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014160838