Showing 1 - 10 of 2,394
This paper uses a unique sample of 175 Spanish equity offerings from 1985 to 2002 to test who benefits from IPO underpricing and why. Institutions receive nearly 75% of the profits in underpriced issues, while they have to bear only 56% of the losses in overpriced offerings. Superior information...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013318846
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001786028
Interest groups differ in the choice of strategy that they use to influence public policy. Some mainly try to gain access, that is, have direct contacts with decision-makers, whereas others tend to “go public”, that is, launch campaigns that aim to mobilize the broader public. We argue that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014166964
(France, Germany, Italy and Spain) despite the common regulatory framework, and also to study the causes that explain this …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014436682
We provide new evidence of the impact of the ongoing deep financial crisis on the performance of Dutch IPOs during the period from January 1990 to May 2012. The findings indicate an increasing level of underpricing as a result of the recent financial crunch. This situation is attributed to the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013068506
This study analyses underpricing in a sample of 41 Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) from the Spanish market between November 2013 and January 2019. The results show a significant underpricing on the initial-day (either when we compute raw or market-adjusted initial returns) concentrated in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012836810
This paper analyses the determinants of the going public decision of the non-financial firms that were listed in the Spanish Continuous Market through an Initial Public Offering of shares (IPO) in the period 1997-2013. We employ series of characteristics related to the firms and the economic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012865735
This paper uses a unique sample of 175 Spanish equity offerings from 1985 to 2002 to test who benefits from IPO underpricing and why. Institutions receive nearly 75% of the profits in underpriced issues, while they have to bear only 56% of the losses in overpriced offerings. Superior information...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011604474
In reflecting on the peculiar legal features of American Depositary Shares, this paper considers the hypothesis of insolvency of some of the relevant parties in the contractual scheme in order to extract the legal implications (both contractual and otherwise) arising from the use of ADRs as a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013131764
, Italy and Poland) as well as two smaller Member States (Finland and Latvia). In addition, the laws of two of the world …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013086789