Showing 1 - 10 of 14
This paper studies individual truth-telling behavior in the presence of multiple lying opportunities with heterogeneous stake sizes. The results show that individuals lie downwards (i.e. forgo money due to their lie) in low-stakes situations in order to signal honesty, and thereby mitigate the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012111150
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012439134
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011941663
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011792176
We experimentally investigate the relationship between (un)kind actions and subsequent deception in a two-player, two-stage game. The first stage involves a dictator game. In the second-stage, the recipient in the dictator game has the opportunity to lie to her counterpart. We study how the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012903252
Do people anticipate the conditions that enable them to manipulate their beliefs when confronted with unpleasant information? We investigate whether individuals seek out the "cognitive flexibility" needed to distort beliefs in self-serving ways, or instead attempt to constrain it, committing to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012271757
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012316493
We examine under what conditions people provide accurate feedback to others. We use feedback regarding attractiveness, a trait people care about, and for which objective information is hard to obtain. Our results show that people avoid giving accurate face-to-face feedback to less attractive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014034915
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012499017
This paper experimentally studies two simple interventions aimed at increasing public goods provision in settings in which accurate feedback about contributions is not available. The first intervention aims to exploit lying aversion by requiring subjects to send a non-verifiable ex post...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011982104