Showing 1 - 10 of 12
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012510937
We set up an experimental coordination game among bank depositors à la Diamond and Dybvig (1983). We elicit subjects' financial literacy and study the impact of revealing this information on the coordination problem typical of this game with multiple equilibria. We find that when no information...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012958221
How are allocation results affected by information that another anonymous participant intends to be more or less generous? We explore this experimentally via two participants facing the same allocation task with only one actually giving after possible adjustment of own generosity based on the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011849321
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011636257
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011593793
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012129365
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012038557
In impunity games proposers, like allocators in dictator games, can take what they want; however, responders can refuse offers deemed unsatisfactory at own cost. We modify the impunity game via allowing offers to condition of another participant’s counterfactual generosity intention. For a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012014804
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011704276
We run a laboratory experiment to investigate how the size of the group affects coordination in a bank-run game played repeatedly by participants facing different fellow depositors. For comparability purposes, we keep the coordination tightness constant across different sizes. Participants...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013311047