Showing 1 - 10 of 13
This paper suggests a combination procedure to exploit the imperfect correlation of cointegration tests to develop a more powerful meta test. To exemplify, we combine Engle and Granger (1987) and Johansen (1988) tests. Either of these underlying tests can be more powerful than the other one...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010264719
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003937365
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003809042
This paper suggests a combination procedure to exploit the imperfect correlation of cointegration tests to develop a more powerful meta test. To exemplify, we combine Engle and Granger (1987) and Johansen (1988) tests. Either of these underlying tests can be more powerful than the other one...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003725800
We use meta analytic combination procedures to develop new tests for panel cointegration. The main idea consists in combining p-values from time series cointegration tests on the different units of the panel. The tests are robust to heterogeneity as well as to cross-sectional dependence between...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003394598
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011969530
We show that the F-test can be both liberal and conservative in the context of a particular type of nonspherical behaviour induced by spatial autocorrelation, and that the conservative variant is more likely to occur for extreme values of the spatial autocorrelation parameter. In particular, it...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003835947
While the limiting null distributions of cointegration tests are invariant to a certain amount of conditional heteroskedasticity as long as global homoskedasticity conditions are fulfilled, they are certainly affected when the innovations exhibit time-varying volatility. Worse yet, distortions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009672473
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008904991
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010356149