Showing 1 - 10 of 1,891
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011860704
Indirect inference testing can be carried out with a variety of auxiliary models. Asymptotically these different models make no difference. However, in small samples power can differ. We explore small sample power with three different auxiliary models: a VAR, average Impulse Response Functions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011471762
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011618365
Indirect inference testing can be carried out with a variety of auxiliary models. Asymptotically these different models make no difference. However, the small sample properties can differ. We explore small sample power and estimation bias both with different variable combinations and descriptive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011886113
Indirect Inference has been found to have much greater power than the Likelihood Ratio in small samples for testing DSGE models. We look at asymptotic and large sample properties of these tests to understand why this might be the case. We find that the power of the LR test is undermined when...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011317842
This paper addresses the growing gulf between traditional macroeconometrics and the increasingly dominant preference among macroeconomists to use DSGE models and to estimate them using Bayesian estimation with strong priors but not to test them as they are likely to fail conventional statistical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011688793
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013470977
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011388070
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010425091
Testing the validity of Value-at-Risk (VaR) forecasts, or backtesting, is an integral part of modern market risk management and regulation. This is often done by applying independence and coverage tests developed in Christoffersen (1998) to so-called hit-sequences derived from VaR forecasts and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013011572