Showing 1 - 10 of 56
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013481747
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000647683
Oates reminds us that tax competition among localities in the presence of capital mobility, may lead to inefficiently low tax rates (and benefits). In contrast, the Tiebout paradigm suggests that tax competition yields an efficient outcome, so that there are no gains from tax coordination. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009528903
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001110906
"The literature on tax competition with free capital mobility cites several reasons for the race-to-the-bottom hypothesis in the sense that tax competition may yield significantly lower tax rates than tax coordination. With a fixed (exogenously given) population that can move from one fiscal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008821675
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013480907
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000802018
Oates reminds us that tax competition among localities in the presence of capital mobility, may lead to inefficiently low tax rates (and benefits). In contrast, the Tiebout paradigm suggests that tax competition yields an efficient outcome, so that there are no gains from tax coordination. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013131671
This paper analyzes the implications of tax policy for the accumulation of human and physical capital and for the overall productivity level of the economy. A comprehensive income tax, applying to both labour income and capital income. discriminates against investments in human capital relative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013245525
Oates reminds us that tax competition among localities in the presence of capital mobility, may lead to inefficiently low tax rates (and benefits). In contrast, the Tiebout paradigm suggests that tax competition yields an efficient outcome, so that there are no gains from tax coordination. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012461987