Showing 1 - 4 of 4
CIR v. Banks (1978) 2 NZLR 472 considered the issue of deductibility of home office expenses. Richardson J rejected the Australian approach, which holds that if the initial capital outlay was made for private purposes, the fact that the property is later used for income-producing is immaterial....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013134068
Does a cooked lobster packed in an individually sealed plastic bag constitute a “prepared fish dinner” or “prepared consumer fish pack” for the purposes of the Income Tax Act 1976, section 156? In Taspac Seafoods Ltd. v. Commissioner of Inland Revenue (1983) 6 NZTC 61,636, 6 TRNZ 513,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013039011
A discussion of the relevant clauses of the Fourth Schedule of the Income Tax Act 1976, which details what can be claimed as expenditure incurred in the course of employment. The discussion is made in light of two cases – Taxation Review Authority Case 18 (1980) 4 TRNZ 199 and Quin v....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013039142
A comment on the case of Grieve v Commissioner of Inland Revenue (1982) 5 NZTC 61,145. The taxpayer had run a loss-making business which he had continued to deduct from other income. Eventually, the Commissioner decided to disallow further deductions. The court upheld the Commissioner's...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013008949