Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Recently dozens of school districts and college admissions systems around the world have reformed their admission rules. As a main motivation for these reforms the policymakers cited strategic flaws of the rules: students had strong incentives to game the system, which caused dramatic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012843021
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012288504
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012197153
Recently, many matching systems around the world have been reformed. These reforms responded to objections that the matching mechanisms in use were unfair and manipulable. Surprisingly, the mechanisms remained unfair even after there forms: the new mechanisms may induce an out come with a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014094889
Manipulability is a threat to the successful design of centralized matching markets. However, in many applications some manipulation is inevitable and the designer wants to compare manipulable mechanisms to select the best among them. We count the number of agents with an incentive to manipulate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014325249
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012586229
We examine incentive compatibility of various school choice mechanisms as measured by the number of manipulating students. We find that Boston with Skips Mechanism, Secure Boston Mechanism, and Chinese Mechanism may have more manipulating students than Boston Mechanism. Similarly, Taiwan...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014346009
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015073881