Showing 1 - 10 of 12
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011876888
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001566114
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001742057
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003747064
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003584234
An influential result in the literature on charitable giving is that matching subsidies dominate rebate subsidies in raising funds. We investigate whether this result extends to 'unit donation' schemes, a popular alternative form of soliciting donations. There, the donors' choices are about the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012385386
We present online-experimental evidence that challenges the generalizability of established results on subsidizing giving by considering a "quantity donation" scheme. We define this scheme as one in which donors choose how many units of a charitable good to fund, rather than the amount of money...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012317373
We conduct a field experiment in conjunction with a direct mail fundraising campaign to test the effect of different forms of subsidies – rebates or matching subsidies – on charitable donations. Previous studies cannot distinguish whether donors are aware of the offer of a subsidy: here...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014180233
A rebate subsidy of rate sr is functionally equivalent to a matching subsidy of rate sm=sr/(1−sr). Other things equal, an individual should respond identically to the two subsidies. We test the effect on charitable giving of the framing of a subsidy as a rebate or as a match. Subjects make a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013125083
We report the results of a field experiment conducted in conjunction with a mailed fundraising campaign of a nonprofit organization. The experiment is designed to compare the response of donors to subsidies in the form of matching amounts or rebated amounts. Matching subsidies are used by many...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013125096