Showing 1 - 10 of 13
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003405408
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003570785
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001776796
This paper argues that in revising the Takeover Bid Directive, EU policymakers should adopt a neutral approach toward takeovers, i.e. enact rules that neither hamper nor promote them. The rationale behind this approach is that takeovers can be both value-creating and value-decreasing and there...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008728815
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009749314
Takeover regulation should neither hamper nor promote takeovers, but instead allow individual companies to decide the contestability of their control. Based on this premise, we advocate a takeover law exclusively made of default and menu rules supporting an effective choice of the takeover...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013035649
This paper argues that in revising the Takeover Bid Directive, EU policymakers should adopt a neutral approach toward takeovers, i.e. enact rules that neither hamper nor promote them. The rationale behind this approach is that takeovers can be both value-creating and value-decreasing and there...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013143816
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001811232
In each of the three largest economies with dispersed ownership of public companies - the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan - hostile takeovers emerged under a common set of circumstances. Yet the national regulatory responses to these new market developments diverged substantially....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013139378
Core institutions of UK corporate governance, in particular those relating to takeovers, board structure and directors' duties, are strongly orientated towards a norm of shareholder primacy. Beyond the core, in particular at the intersection of insolvency and employment law, stakeholder...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013120335