Showing 1 - 10 of 2,243
The authors construct a model for Mexico in which class conflict over the distribution of the surplus is the principal determinant of the terms of trade. The model consists of seven social classes and eight productive sectors. The paper investigates various policy scenarios under the theories of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015104345
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011509756
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000062820
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000926758
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001210613
We study the role of inter-group differences in the emergence of conflict. In our setting, two groups compete for the right to allocate societys resources, and we allow for costly intergroup mobility. The winning group offers an allocation, that the opposition can either accept, or reject and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010280829
In a contest with positional dynamics between an incumbent and a challenger i) inequality of power may magnify conflicts, ii) more severe conflicts can go together with lower turnover of incumbents, and iii) power can be self defeating as cost advantages can reduce pay-offs. These three...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010287741
This paper considers incentives for information acquisition ahead of conflicts. First, we characterize the (unique) equilibrium of the all-pay auction between two players with one-sided asymmetric information where one player has private information about his valuation. Then, we use ou rresults...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010334005
In many kinds of bilateral negotiations the resolution of the issues at stake has an impact which extends beyond the remits of the parties directly involved (e.g. labour negotiations in sectors of public interest, where a strike would impact on the public at large). Once this is recognised,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010262827
Can two negotiators fail to agree when both the size of the surplus and the rationality of the negotiators are common knowledge? We show that the answer is affirmative. When the negotiators can make irrevocable commitments at a low but positive cost, the unique symmetric equilibrium entails...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010263800