Showing 1 - 10 of 239
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001426329
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001469947
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000994246
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000988763
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011653086
This paper studies tests of calendar effects in equity returns. It is necessary to control for all possible calendar effects to avoid spurious results. The authors contribute to the calendar effects literature and its significance with a test for calendar-specific anomalies that conditions on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010397591
When evaluating the significance of calendar effects, such as those associated with Monday and January, it is necessary to control for all possible calendar effects to avoid spurious results. The downside of having to control for a large number of possible calendar effects is that it diminish...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010318856
When alternatives are compared using an estimated criterion function, this may introduce a discrepancy between the true and the estimated criterion. In this paper, we consider a situation where a preordering (ranking) of stochastic sequences is defined from expected loss/gain, using a parametric...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010318932
This paper applies the Model Confidence Set (MCS) procedure of Hansen, Lunde, and Nason (2003) to a set of volatility models. A MCS is analogous to confidence interval of a parameter in the sense that the former contains the best forecasting model with a certain probability. The key to the MCS...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010318935
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003341258