Showing 1 - 10 of 14,681
We introduce banks, modeled as in Diamond and Rajan (JoF 2000 or JPE 2001), into a standard DSGE model and use this framework to study the role of banks in the transmission of shocks, the effects of monetary policy when banks are exposed to runs, and the interplay between monetary policy and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003929248
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011715175
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012241320
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011942146
We take issue with claims that the funding mix of banks, which makes them fragile and crisis-prone, is efficient because it reflects special liquidity benefits of bank debt. Even aside from neglecting the systemic damage to the economy that banks' distress and default cause, such claims are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011925841
We take issue with claims that the funding mix of banks, which makes them fragile and crisisprone, is efficient because it reflects special liquidity benefits of bank debt. Even aside from neglecting the systemic damage to the economy that banks' distress and default cause, such claims are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011977827
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003770846
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003778496
Using the model of Rochet and Vives (2004), this note shows that a prudential regulator can in general not mitigate a bank’s failure risk solely by means of liquidity requirements. However, their effectiveness can be restored if, in addition, minimum capital requirements are met. This provides...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003973628
This paper provides a compact framework for banking regulation analysis in the presence of uncertainty between systemic liquidity and solvency shocks. Extending the work by Cao & Illing (2009a, b), it is shown that systemic liquidity shortage arises endogenously as part of the inferior mixed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003952099