Showing 1 - 10 of 510
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014458575
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014458810
In their IZA Discussion Paper 10247, Johansson and Lee claim that the main result (Proposition 3) in Abbring and Van den Berg (2003b) does not hold. We show that their claim is incorrect. At a certain point within their line of reasoning, they make a rather basic error while transforming one...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011543629
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011290886
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011924705
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001803822
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003815789
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009688992
I explore the implications of the lumpy labor adjustment as a propagation mechanism for aggregate dynamics. The model I use nests the basic RBC model with a staggered-job-turnover in the spirit of Taylor (1980) and Calvo (1983). It extends this approach by introducing a Weibull-distributed labor...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010263723
I explore the aggregate effects of micro lumpy labor adjustment in a prototypical RBC model, which embeds a stochastic labor duration mechanism in the spirit of Calvo(1983), and it extends this approach by introducing a Weibull-distributed labor adjustment process to capture the increasing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010263744