Showing 1 - 10 of 23
The Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Method can be used either in the single or double bound formulation. The former is easier to implement, while the latter is known to be more efficient. We analyse the bias of the ML estimates produced by either model, and the gain in efficiency...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011608474
When modelling data generated from a discrete choice contingent valuation question, the treatment of zero bids affects the welfare estimates. Zero bids may come from respondents who are not interested in the provision of the public good; alternatively, some zero-bidders may be protesting about...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011608619
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001726080
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001401006
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001374871
Respondents of contingent valuation surveys may place a null value on the public good, for reasons that differ from a genuine indifference to the good, but that can be interpreted as a "protest": either against the interview, or the public management, or both. A good survey design can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014172838
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000939701
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010238571
Distributional assumptions are crucial in the estimation of the value of public projects assessed by means of contingent valuation analyses, and it would seem obvious that tests for model specification should play an important part in the statistical analysis. It can be observed, though, that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011608796
Selectivity bias caused by protest responses in Contingent Valuation studies can be detected and corrected by means of sample selection models. This paper compares two methods: the Heckman 2-steps method and the full ML, applied to data on forest recreation - where WTP is elicited as a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011608859