Showing 1 - 10 of 193
We provide a framework for analyzing bilateral mergers when there is two-sided asymmetric information about firms' types. We show that there is always a no-merger equilibrium where firms do not consent to a merger, irrespective of their type. There may also be a cut-off equilibrium if the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010315502
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003773442
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001927967
We provide a framework for analyzing bilateral mergers when there is two-sided asymmetric information about firms’ types. We show that there is always a "no-merger" equilibrium where firms do not consent to a merger, irrespective of their type. There may also be a "cut-off" equilibrium if the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001729427
We analyze a Bayesian merger game under two-sided asymmetric information about firm types. We show that the standard prediction of the lemons market model-if any, only low-type firms are traded-is likely to be misleading: Merger returns, i.e. the difference between pre- and post-merger profits,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014097552
We examine vertical backward integration in a reducedform model of successive oligopolies. Our key findings are: (i) There may be asymmetric equilibria where some firms integrate and others remain separated, even if firms are symmetric initially; (ii) Efficient firms are more likely to integrate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010315532
We investigate how various institutional settings affect a network provider's incentives to invest in infrastructure quality. Under reasonable assumptions on demand, investment incentives turn out to be smaller under vertical separation than under vertical integration, though we also provide...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010315603
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003629107
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002497137
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001828758