Showing 1 - 10 of 13
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003680257
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010339560
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001778563
In the United States insurance is regulated both by state insurance commissions and class action litigation. The interaction of these two systems has not been extensively studied. We examine four different facets of the regulation litigation tradeoff. The first is to examine whether a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013151431
The use of so-called “pay-for-delay” settlements in patent litigation – in which a branded manufacturer and generic entrant settle a Paragraph IV patent challenge and agree to forestall entry – has come under considerable scrutiny in recent years. Critics argue that these settlements are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012988266
The use of “pay-for-delay” settlements in patent litigation – in which a branded manufacturer and generic entrant settle a Paragraph IV patent challenge and agree to forestall entry – has come under considerable scrutiny in recent years. Critics argue that these settlements are collusive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012993248
Oliver Williamson has coined the term "fundamental transformation". It captures the following situation: before they strike a deal, buyer and seller are protected by competition. Yet thereafter they find themselves in a bilateral monopoly. With common knowledge of standard preferences, both...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012306406
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012027645
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012027646
The use of "pay-for-delay" settlements in patent litigation - in which a branded manufacturer and generic entrant settle a Paragraph IV patent challenge and agree to forestall entry - has come under considerable scrutiny in recent years. Critics argue that these settlements are collusive and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012456481