Showing 1 - 10 of 7,090
Damage compensation claims in case of cartels are supposed to increase deterrence, compensate losses and increase efficiency. I show that such claims can instead have adverse effects: If suppliers or buyers of cartelists are compensated in proportion to the profits lost due to the cartel,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010194468
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009749946
Public and private action against cartels is an internationally recognized cornerstone of antitrust enforcement. Effective private enforcement requires that cartel victims can receive (at least) full compensation for the harm suffered. Academics and competition authorities support this goal with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010233583
While private actions for damages by customers against price-cartels receive much attention, the treatment of other groups affected by such conspiracies is largely unresolved. This article narrows the research gap with respect to suppliers to a downstream price cartel. First, we show that such...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009787408
In competition law, the problem of the optimal design of institutional and procedural rules concerns assessment processes of the pro- and anticompetitiveness of business behaviors. This is well recognized in the discussion about the relative merits of different assessment principles such as the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008936424
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001558511
The present paper analyzes the interaction between the economic review of the probition of abuses of a dominant position (Article 82 EC) on the one hand and the efforts to enhance private enforcement of competition law through private damage claims on the other hand. The paper argues that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013134375
The reanimated debate about the regulation or control of exploitative prices by competition authorities can demonstrate, inter alia, that the phenomenon of divergence of substantive standards and even of different goals of national and supranational competition or antitrust laws is often not...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013136732
There is a data paradox in competition enforcement. Data is an infinitely scalable, widely available, non-rivalrous and non-exclusive asset. The European Commission's merger decisional practice suggests that these features make data a kind of asset unlikely to be conducive to competition issues....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012872180
This paper presents results from a laboratory experiment on the channels through which different law enforcement strategies deter cartel formation. With leniency policies offering immunity to the first reporting party a high fine is the main determinant of deterrence, having a strong effect even...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013050458